![]() ![]() “Attentional effects in dichotic listening.” Brain and Language 49 (1995): 189–201Īsbjørnsen A. “Manipulations of subjects’ arousal in dichotic listening.” Brain and Cognition 19 (1992): 183–194.Īsbjørnsen, A. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īsbjørnsen A., Hugdahl K., and Bryden M. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. ![]() The basic experimental dichotic listening situation is shown in Figure 2.1. Recent data both from experimental and clinical studies suggest that the DL method may be a sensitive non-invasive technique to probe not only language lateralization, which is the “classic” application, but also sustained attention ( Hugdahl and Andersson, 1986), shift of attention ( Asbjørnsen and Bryden, 1998), hemispheric integration and corpus callosum function ( Cowell and Hugdahl, 2000), evaluation of neurosurgical therapy (Wester et al., 1998), and cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders ( Løberg et al., 1999 Bruder, 1995 Wexler, 1986). ![]() In the present chapter I will give a short overview of the use of dichotic listening (DL) in neuropsychology, and what has been learnt from this method over the last almost 40 years of research and clinical practice, from the pioneering work by ( Kimura 1961 a, b) and Bryden (1963) to modern use of the DL technique in both basic brain science ( Tervaniemi et al., 1999 Hugdahl et al, 1999) to clinical practice ( Roberts et al., 1990). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |